Procter & Gamble Co: Sustainable Packaging Policies for Flexible Plastics

<- Back to Resolution Tracker

WHEREAS: Without immediate and sustained new commitments throughout the plastics value chain, annual flows of plastics into oceans could nearly triple by 2040.[1] The growing plastic pollution crisis poses increasing risks to Procter & Gamble. Corporations could face an annual financial risk of approximately $100 billion should governments require them to cover the waste management costs of packaging they produce.[2] Governments around the world are increasingly enacting such policies, including five new state laws that impose fees on corporations for single-use plastic (SUP) packaging.[3] The European Union has banned ten SUP pollutants and taxed some non-recycled plastic packaging.[4] A French law requires 10% of packaging be reusable by 2027 and Portugal requires 30% reusable packaging by 2030.[5] Additionally, consumer demand for sustainable packaging is increasing.[6]

 Pew Charitable Trusts’ groundbreaking study, Breaking the Plastic Wave (“Pew Report”), concluded that improved recycling alone is insufficient to address plastic pollution—instead, recycling must be coupled with reductions in use, materials redesign, and substitution.[7] The Pew Report finds that the greatest opportunity to reduce or eliminate plastic lies with flexible plastic packaging—thin, disposable plastic often used to package food, laundry, and beauty and home care products. This packaging is virtually unrecyclable in America. With innovation, redesign, and substitution, 26 million metric tons of flexibles can be avoided globally.[8]

 The Pew Report finds that reducing plastic use is the most viable solution from environmental, economic, and social perspectives, yet broad corporate and stakeholder alignment on flexible packaging solutions is lacking.[9]

 Despite its stated commitments to sustainable packaging, approximately 19% of P&G’s packaging remains in flexible packaging.[10]  In the absence of immediate action to eliminate flexibles by robustly engaging in research and expansion of reusable packaging, P&G will fail to meet its 2030 packaging goals. P&G lags in its goal to reduce virgin plastic by 50% by 2030, with total corporate virgin plastic use increasing 3% in 2020-2021.[11]

 Our Company could avoid regulatory, environmental, and competitive risks by adopting a comprehensive approach to addressing flexible plastic packaging use at scale.

BE IT RESOLVED:  Shareholders request that the Board issue a report, at reasonable expense and excluding proprietary information, describing how P&G could address flexible plastic packaging in alignment with the findings of the Pew Report, or other authoritative sources, to reduce its contribution to plastic pollution.

 SUPPORTING STATEMENT: The report should, at Board discretion:

  • Assess the reputational, financial, and operational risks associated with continuing to use non-recyclable plastic packaging while plastic pollution grows;

  • Evaluate feasible actions to achieve fully recyclable packaging including elimination and accelerated research into innovative reusable substitution; and

  • Describe opportunities to pre-competitively work with peers to research and develop reusable packaging as an alternative to single-use packaging.

Resolution Details

Company: Procter & Gamble Co

Lead Filers:
As You Sow

Year: 2025

Filing Date: April 2025

Initiative(s): Consumer Packaging

Status: Filed

Download PDF

Circular EconomyAs You Sowplastic packaging, Sustainability, Consumer Packaging, packaging, flexible, flexibles, flexible packaging, plastic pollution, plastic reduction, circular economy, circular economy for packaging, ocean plastic pollution, recyclable, reusable, reusable packaging, recyclable packaging, compostable, flexible plastics, Procter & Gamble, P&G